This does not mean confusables.txt is wrong. It means confusables.txt is a visual-similarity claim that has never been empirically validated at scale. Many entries map characters to the same abstract target under NFKC decomposition (mathematical bold A to A, for instance), and the mapping is semantically correct even if the glyphs look nothing alike. But if you treat every confusables.txt entry as equally dangerous for UI security, you are generating massive false positive rates for 96.5% of the dataset.
В России ответили на имитирующие высадку на Украине учения НАТО18:04
。同城约会是该领域的重要参考
ВсеСтильВнешний видЯвленияРоскошьЛичности。旺商聊官方下载对此有专业解读
Facial recognition